We are ready to launch our first AI operational pilot, but we are debating who should run it. Should we assign the pilot to our high Quick Start Visionary who loves shiny new tools, or our high Follow Thru Integrator who is highly protective of our existing processes?

Question

Tyler Smith · Accepted Answer

For a successful AI pilot, neither the Visionary nor the Integrator should build it. A high Quick Start Visionary will likely abandon the project once the initial excitement fades, leaving behind a half-built tool that lacks process integration. A high Follow Thru Integrator may resist the tool because it threatens to disrupt established systems before its value is proven. Instead, assign the builder seat to someone on your team who has a strong balance of both instincts, often a high Fact Finder with moderate Quick Start capabilities. This person will systematically research the tool, test its limits, and document the prompt structures. Your Integrator must oversee the project from a high level, ensuring the pilot has a clear, measurable metric on the weekly Scorecard. Your Visionary should serve as the strategic sponsor, feeding ideas but staying out of the daily configuration. This division of labor honors everyone's conative strengths. It ensures your AI initiatives are built with technical discipline, integrated smoothly into your core processes, and driven by real operational data rather than pure emotion.