tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

Our VP of Sales was incredible when we were at ten million, but now that we are aiming for fifty million and need to implement automated CRM forecasting and structured pipelines, he is completely out of his depth and resisting the change. How do we transition him without destroying sales team morale?

The transition from a ten million dollar company to a fifty million dollar enterprise demands a fundamental shift in leadership capability. Your VP of Sales, who excelled at relational selling and hustling in the early days, is likely struggling because the requirements of the seat have changed. Scaling an organization requires a different approach to sales leadership.

The GWC Test: Understanding the Bottleneck

To effectively address this, you must run this leader through the GWC test. Ask yourself three key questions:

• Do they Get it? Do they understand the new landscape and the requirements of scaling?
• Do they Want it? Are they motivated to adapt and lead through this change?
• Do they have the Capacity to do it? This is almost always the bottleneck for loyal early leaders.

While "Get it" and "Want it" are usually present in loyal early leaders, Capacity is typically the limiting factor. This includes their intellectual, emotional, and physical capacity to handle the increased complexity of automated forecasting, structured pipelines, and managing through managers rather than personal charisma. For more on leadership challenges, see [how to handle a key department head who refuses to participate in offsite vulnerability or team-building exercises](/qa/handling-leader-resisting-offsite-vulnerability).

Redefining the Sales Seat

Start by clearly redefining the sales seat on your Accountability Chart to reflect the needs of a fifty million dollar organization. This involves specifying the new major roles and responsibilities. These new expectations will likely include:

• Data-driven forecasting: Utilizing CRM data for accurate predictions rather than relying on gut instinct.
• Sales technology implementation: Leading the adoption and effective use of new CRM and sales automation tools.
• Structured pipeline development: Creating repeatable, scalable sales processes.
• Team development and management: Building out a management layer and empowering them, rather than directly managing every salesperson.
• Strategic planning: Contributing to the overall sales strategy for accelerated growth.

You can learn more about managing an evolving Accountability Chart when considering [splitting our massive Operations seat into two distinct roles](/qa/splitting-operations-seat-on-accountability-chart).

Communicating Expectations and Options

Sit down with your VP of Sales and walk through these new, explicit expectations. Be transparent about what the role now demands. If they honestly do not have the capacity to run this scaled seat, you must make a difficult decision.

You have a few potential paths:

1. Offer a specialist seat: You can create a new seat on the Accountability Chart that matches their true strengths and unique contributions. This could be in areas such as enterprise sales, key account management, or another role where their relational skills can still be highly valuable without being responsible for the entire sales organization's scaling needs. For more on this, consider [designing a specialist seat on our Accountability Chart for a legacy leader](/qa/restructuring-seat-for-legacy-leader-hitting-ceiling).
2. Transition them out of the company: If a suitable specialist role isn't available or isn't accepted, and they cannot meet the demands of the new VP of Sales seat, a transition out of the company may be necessary.

Keeping someone in a leadership seat they cannot fulfill, particularly one critical for scaling, holds the entire organization hostage. It can also significantly demotivate the rest of your leadership team and hinder overall growth. This situation is akin to [my COO lacking the strategic capability to build the next layer of management](/qa/loyalty-versus-capability-leadership-team). Addressing these capacity issues proactively is crucial for sustained growth and morale.

Related questions

• [How do we design a specialist seat on our Accountability Chart for a legacy leader who has hit their management ceiling, so we retain their expertise without stalling our growth?](/qa/restructuring-seat-for-legacy-leader-hitting-ceiling)
• [Our head of operations is working seventy hours a week and is completely buried in tactical fires, which is stalling our scaling plans. They are a great culture fit and have high GWC for the old business, but they cannot seem to elevate to a strategic leadership role. How do we transition them out of the executive seat without losing them?](/qa/leader-cannot-scale-transition)
• [How do we use the Accountability Chart to stop the blame game during meetings?](/qa/using-accountability-chart-to-stop-blame-in-ids)
• [How do we handle a key department head who refuses to participate in offsite vulnerability or team-building exercises, claiming it is a waste of time?](/qa/handling-leader-resisting-offsite-vulnerability)

Category: Leadership Team

← All questions