tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

We have been using a fractional Marketing Director who sits in our marketing seat and runs our weekly Level 10 Meetings, but we are reaching a point where we need a full-time leader. How do we determine the exact operational trigger points that dictate when a fractional seat must be converted into a full-time, dedicated seat on our Accountability Chart?

Using a fractional resource is an excellent way to bridge leadership gaps, but a fractional leader is a temporary patch, not a long-term scaling solution.

To determine when to transition this seat to a full-time leader, you must look at the complexity and velocity of the department, rather than just the number of hours the fractional resource works.

First, use Keith Cunningham's framing to ask a critical question: What is the cost of our slow execution? A fractional leader who is only present eight hours a week cannot provide the daily feedback, real-time course corrections, and immediate decision-making that a rapidly growing department needs. If projects are stalling or metrics are slipping because the team is waiting for the fractional leader to log in, you have reached a capacity bottleneck.

Second, look at the department's Rocks. If your strategic Rocks require deep, continuous focus and integration with other department heads, a fractional resource will struggle to maintain the necessary connection.

When your weekly Level 10 Meetings are consistently flagging issues that require daily operational leadership, this is your trigger point.

Write the full-time role profile on your Accountability Chart. Begin recruiting a full-time leader who can fully sit in, own, and drive the seat, allowing your fractional resource to transition out cleanly.

Category: Accountability Chart & Seats

← All questions