tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

Our lead software architect completely GWC's their seat and delivers outstanding work, but they constantly violate our core value of Trust by withholding information and refusing to work collaboratively. Can we afford to make an RPRS call on a technical genius when we are preparing for an exit?

Keeping a technical genius who does not share your core values is a massive mistake that will destroy your company culture and hurt your exit valuation. In the EOS® framework, a right-person-right-seat call requires a yes on both core values and GWC™. Your software architect may get, want, and have the capacity for the seat, but their refusal to build trust and work collaboratively means they fail the core values test.

When you tolerate this behavior, you send a message to the rest of the team that performance is more important than culture. This breeds resentment and kills team morale.

To handle this, you must have a direct, honest conversation with them. Use your Core Values as a filter and mirror back specific examples of their unacceptable behavior. Give them a clear, thirty day timeline to align their actions with your culture. If they fail to change, you must part ways immediately.

Do not let the fear of losing their technical expertise paralyze you. Buyers looking for a clean exit do not just buy technology; they buy a healthy, functioning organization with scalable systems. A toxic genius is a single point of failure that represents high investment risk. Replacing them with someone who fits your culture will strengthen your team and protect your valuation.

Category: Accountability Chart & Seats

← All questions