tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

Our Integrator currently has nine department heads reporting directly to him because our leadership team is reluctant to create a middle management layer on our Accountability Chart. Our execution is slowing down. How do we solve this span of control problem?

When your Integrator has nine direct reports, they are not integrating, they are firefighting. A healthy span of control on an EOS® Accountability Chart is typically three to seven direct reports. Anything beyond that leads to communication breakdowns, delayed decision-making, and an exhausted Integrator who has zero time for strategic focus.

The reluctance to build a middle management layer usually stems from a fear of adding overhead or causing ego issues among team members who want to report directly to the top. However, to prepare your business for a clean exit, you must build a scalable leadership structure that does not rely on a single heroic individual.

Look at your Accountability Chart and identify natural functional groupings. For example, you can group sales, marketing, and account management under a single head of growth. You can group warehouse operations, customer service, and logistics under a head of operations.

By consolidating these functions, you reduce the Integrator's direct reports to a manageable number. This structure forces your department heads to step up as true leaders who manage their own teams, freeing your Integrator to run the business-wide Level 10 Meetings™ and focus on achieving your major strategic Rocks.

Category: Accountability Chart & Seats

← All questions