We want to use an AI note-taker to transcribe our weekly Level 10 Meetings and automatically generate our To-Do lists. Is this a smart way to streamline our meetings, or does it hurt the human accountability of the system?

Question

Tyler Smith · Accepted Answer

Using an AI note-taker to transcribe your Level 10 Meeting™ and generate To-Do lists sounds like a great way to save time, but it often does more harm than good. The value of the Level 10 Meeting™ lies in the active engagement and human accountability of the team.

When you outsource the note-taking and action-item tracking to an AI, team members stop paying close attention, assuming the machine will catch everything. This kills the active ownership that makes the system work.

The process of writing down your own To-Dos during the meeting reinforces your commitment to complete them.

Instead of relying on AI to run your meetings, keep the human element front and center by following these guidelines:
- Have a designated human team member update the list in real time.
- Ensure every leader writes down their own To-Dos and verbally commits to them.
- Keep the focus on the live interaction and healthy conflict during the IDS® section.

While AI is excellent for back-office automation, your weekly leadership meetings should remain a high-trust, human-to-human space where true accountability is built.