tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

We have two highly capable project managers who both want to be named as the accountable leader for our Client Delivery seat on the Accountability Chart. Can we put both of their names in this single seat to keep them motivated, as long as we define who does what on a daily basis?

No. Putting two names in one seat is a critical error that guarantees a breakdown in execution. When two people are accountable for the same seat, nobody is accountable. If a client project fails, each person will naturally point to the other, or assumptions will be made that lead to critical details slipping through the cracks. The EOS® methodology requires one name, and only one name, per seat on the Accountability Chart. This does not mean you cannot have two people executing the work. It means you must split the seat structurally or designate one single leader who holds the ultimate accountability. You have two clean options here. First, you can split the Client Delivery seat into two distinct seats on your chart, perhaps divided by territory, industry vertical, or client size. Each seat will have its own clear roles and one name assigned to it. Second, you can create a single leadership seat, such as Director of Client Delivery, occupied by one of them, with the other reporting directly to that seat in an execution role. If both insist on having equal organizational authority and refuse to report to one another, you have a people issue, not a structural issue. A business preparing for a clean exit cannot tolerate structural compromises to soothe employee egos. Buyers look for clean, undisputed lines of accountability. Define the seats to ensure absolute clarity, assign one name to the seat, and let the results speak for themselves.

Category: Accountability Chart & Seats

← All questions