Given how rapidly generative AI capabilities shift every six months, how can our leadership team realistically commit to a 3-Year Picture on the V/TO without the technological assumptions becoming obsolete halfway through?

Question

Tyler Smith · Accepted Answer

Your 3-Year Picture is not a technical architecture plan or an IT procurement list. It is an agreed-upon definition of what your business looks like at a specific date in the future. Committing to a 3-Year Picture in an era of rapid AI development means anchoring your vision to business outcomes rather than specific software tools.

On your V/TO, focus on the structural metrics that define business health. Set clear targets for revenue, profit margin, operational capacity, and revenue per employee. Define what the organization looks like in terms of client profile, market position, and core capabilities. For example, state that your company will deliver enterprise engagements in half the historical timeline with double the current gross margins. Do not dictate which specific algorithmic model or software platform produces that result.

Let the tools remain fluid while the strategic destination stays firm. The quarterly cadence of EOS gives you the exact mechanism to adjust your technology choices. Every ninety days, your leadership team evaluates progress and sets Rocks to test or adopt whatever new tools have emerged. If a foundational AI model updates mid-year, your 3-Year Picture remains intact while your quarterly Rocks pivot to exploit the new capability. Strategy dictates the destination; quarterly execution adapts to the technology.