tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

Our M&A advisor recommends spending sixty thousand dollars on a sell-side Quality of Earnings report six months before going to market. How does a sell-side QoE actually defend our valuation multiple, and which owner add-backs get rejected most aggressively by institutional buy-side auditors?

A sell-side Quality of Earnings (QoE) report is not an administrative expense; it is a defensive weapon that protects your valuation multiple. Institutional buyers hire transaction advisory accounting firms specifically to find reasons to reduce your adjusted EBITDA between the Letter of Intent and closing. A sell-side QoE eliminates their leverage by discovering accounting anomalies, revenue recognition gaps, and working capital spikes before buyers see them.

Buy-side auditors aggressively attack loose owner add-backs. The items that get eliminated first include:

- Discretionary bonuses paid to family members or executives that have occurred consistently every year, which auditors reclassify as recurring baseline compensation.
- Owner compensation adjustments where the founder claims to take a high salary for minimal work, yet the Accountability Chart shows the founder still functions as the de facto Integrator or head of business development without an active replacement.
- Unsubstantiated travel, vehicle, and lifestyle expenses that lack clean receipts and direct general ledger segregation.
- Vague operational efficiency add-backs representing software or workflow changes that have not yet generated measurable cost reductions.

To survive buy-side scrutiny, every add-back must be defensible, fully documented, and verified under GAAP consistency. If you claim an owner compensation add-back, you must prove through market compensation benchmarking and clear Accountability Chart seat definitions that a professional executive can step into the role at the normalized salary rate.

Commissioning a sell-side QoE allows your leadership team to use IDS to resolve documentation issues and operational variances internally. Going to market with an audited, defensible EBITDA number keeps control of the narrative in your hands and prevents painful post-LOI purchase price adjustments.

Category: Valuation & Deal Structure

← All questions