tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

Our weekly Scorecard has fifteen metrics, but when a number goes red, the leadership team spends the entire meeting debating whose department actually caused the drop. How do we establish absolute accountability for every single number?

When a leadership team spends their weekly meeting debating who is responsible for a failing scorecard metric, it means your Scorecard lacks single-point accountability. You cannot have shared ownership of a number; when multiple people own a metric, nobody owns it.

Every single number on your weekly Scorecard must have one name next to it. That individual is not especially the person doing all the physical work, but they are the person responsible for reporting the status and leading the solution if the number goes red.

During your Level 10 Meeting, when a metric falls below its target, there should be zero debate about who owns the issue. The owner of the metric must drop it down to the Issues List.

Once the number is on the Issues List, you use the IDS process to solve the underlying problem. The focus must shift from blaming individuals to solving the systemic roadblock. If the sales metric is down because marketing did not deliver leads, that is an issue to be solved through collaboration, not a reason to deflect ownership.

By establishing absolute single-point accountability, you eliminate finger-pointing and create a culture where red numbers are viewed as opportunities for improvement rather than personal failures.

Category: EOS Implementation

← All questions