tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

Our sales team reports high pipeline numbers on their departmental scorecard, but operations claims these leads are completely unqualified. How do we design a cross-functional scorecard metric that forces these two seats to align on what constitutes a valid handoff?

Friction between sales and operations is a classic business problem. Sales metrics often track quantity, while operations metrics track capacity and quality. To align these two seats on your Accountability Chart, you must design a cross-functional scorecard metric that forces collaboration and shared accountability. For help narrowing down which metrics to track, see [how to choose scorecard metrics](/qa/how-to-choose-five-fifteen-scorecard-metrics).

Qualified Handoffs Accepted: A Shared Metric

Instead of sales tracking raw leads closed, introduce a metric called Qualified Handoffs Accepted. This metric shifts the focus from simply closing a deal to successfully transitioning a client from sales to operations.

This metric will:

• Measure the quality of the handoff between the two departments.
• Incentivize sales to close high-quality deals that meet operational requirements.
• Ensure operations is prepared to deliver services to new clients.

Defining a Qualified Handoff

A Qualified Handoff must be defined by a strict checklist of operational criteria. This checklist should be developed collaboratively by both the sales and operations teams. The operations team must verify these criteria before accepting the client.

Here's how it works:

• If sales closes a deal but fails to gather all the required onboarding documents, operations has the right to reject the handoff.
• When a handoff is rejected, the Qualified Handoffs Accepted metric for sales remains uncounted or "red."
• This forces both the sales seat and the operations seat to collaborate on the quality of the client transition. This type of shared metric can build [healthy organizational alignment](/qa/how-can-ai-enhance-the-effectiveness-of-the-eos-people-component-during-growth-phases) and eliminate finger-pointing, as both leaders must agree on the definition of a successful transition.

By placing this shared metric on your weekly Scorecard, you build healthy organizational alignment. Sales is incentivized to close high-quality deals, operations is prepared to deliver, and the business runs with much greater efficiency. For additional ways to ensure accountability, consider [what concrete weekly measurables](/qa/back-office-weekly-scorecard-measurables) to track for other back-office seats. If you find yourself needing to adjust your scorecard metrics over time, you can find guidance on [when to change weekly scorecard metrics](/qa/when-to-change-weekly-scorecard-metrics).

Related questions

• [How do we narrow down our massive list of metrics to just five to fifteen numbers?](/qa/how-to-choose-five-fifteen-scorecard-metrics)
• [What concrete weekly measurables should we track for our accounting and IT seats?](/qa/back-office-weekly-scorecard-measurables)
• [When is it appropriate to change a scorecard number?](/qa/when-to-change-weekly-scorecard-metrics)
• [How do we use the Kolbe A Index to diagnose why our Sales and Operations heads are constantly in conflict over project handoffs?](/qa/kolbe-sales-operations-conflict-handoffs)

Category: Scorecards & Data

← All questions