tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

Our lead software architect is an absolute genius who perfectly GWCs his seat, but he routinely insults his team members and completely ignores our core value of collaborative growth. How do we handle this classic Right Seat, Wrong Person dilemma?

This is the classic Right Seat, Wrong Person dilemma, and it is a toxic virus that will slowly destroy your company culture. No matter how brilliant this lead architect is, or how much intellectual property he holds, you cannot allow a Core Values violator to remain on your team.

In the EOS® framework, to be a Right Person, an individual must consistently exhibit your core values. Your lead architect fails this test. By keeping him in his seat, you are sending a clear message to the rest of the company that performance is more important than culture. This destroys trust and demotivates your high-performers who actually live your values.

You must handle this with absolute clarity and zero sentimentality. Schedule a private meeting and use the People Analyzer™ to show him exactly where he is falling short on the core value of collaborative growth. Give him clear, specific examples of his toxic behavior.

Establish a strict, thirty-day correction window. This is his opportunity to change his behavior. Do not accept excuses about stress or deadlines. If he does not make a permanent shift to align with your core values, you must transition him out of the company.

Before you make the call, run a Thinking Time session to map out the transition. How can you document his code and cross-train other team members to minimize the operational risk? Protecting your culture is always worth the temporary operational friction.

Category: Accountability Chart & Seats

← All questions