Our lead software architect GWC's his seat perfectly and is essential to our technology, but he is a terrible core values fit and actively damages team morale. Since he holds all our product tribal knowledge, how do we handle this Right Seat, Wrong Person situation?
A person who GWCs their seat but violates your core values is a toxic force in your business. While they may deliver short-term results, keeping them on your leadership team destroys culture, kills morale, and ultimately lowers your exit value because your operations are dependent on a single hostile node.
To resolve this, you must first eliminate the key-person risk by extracting their tribal knowledge. Do not fire them immediately if doing so would collapse your operations. Instead, make the documentation of their processes, code, and systems a primary quarterly Rock for them. Frame this as a standard scaling initiative, not a performance plan.
At the same time, assign a junior team member to shadow them or assist them, effectively transferring the unique expertise to another seat on your Accountability Chart.
Once the tribal knowledge is securely documented and shared, you must address the core values violation. Give them a clear, documented warning with specific behavioral expectations. If they do not immediately and permanently correct their behavior, you must transition them out of the company. A business dependent on a toxic genius is not exit-ready. Buyers want to acquire a healthy, repeatable system, not a hostage situation.
Category: Accountability Chart & Seats