tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

Every department head sources their own software subscriptions and outside vendors, creating ballooning costs and unvetted contracts, but none of our leaders want to take accountability for Vendor Procurement on the Accountability Chart. How do we resolve this orphaned seat?

When nobody wants to own a critical business function, the root cause is almost always that accountability has been blurred across multiple departments. If everyone buys their own software licenses and negotiates independent supplier contracts, no single leader feels responsible for the resulting waste.

You cannot solve this by making Vendor Procurement a shared responsibility across the leadership team. Shared accountability is no accountability. You must follow the principle of structure before people.

First, define the Vendor Procurement seat purely based on what the company needs. Outline the five core roles for the seat:
- Centralized vendor contract negotiation and renewals.
- Software license auditing and tech-stack rationalization.
- Supplier risk and compliance screening.
- Spend forecasting and cost-control benchmarking.
- Service level agreement monitoring and vendor dispute resolution.

Second, determine where this seat reports. In most small to mid-market organizations, this function belongs under the Finance seat or the Operations seat, not scattered across department heads.

Third, assign a single name to the seat. If nobody on your existing leadership team has GWC™ for this specialized discipline, you have three practical choices: assign it temporarily to your Finance leader while consolidating purchasing authority through strict approval gates; engage a fractional procurement specialist; or use automated procurement workflows to centralize renewals under an existing administrative manager. Until one person owns the seat, vendor expenses will continue to bleed company profit.

Category: Accountability Chart & Seats

← All questions