tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

We are in a highly regulated manufacturing sector and need a dedicated seat for Regulatory Compliance and Field Audits, but absolutely nobody on our leadership team wants to own it because it is seen as bureaucratic, thankless, and adversarial. How do we fill this seat without forcing it on an unwilling manager?

Forcing a leadership team member into a seat they do not want is a guaranteed way to fail the GWC assessment. They might have the capability, but they clearly lack the want. This creates a gaping vulnerability in a highly regulated sector.

To solve this, first separate the seat from your current people. Step back and define the five core roles of this compliance seat on your Accountability Chart. Next, use Keith Cunningham's Thinking Time framework to ask a high-value question: How might we resource this compliance seat so that our operations remain protected without draining our current leaders?

The answer is often found by looking at the conative profiles of your wider team. This seat requires a specific natural method of operation. You need someone who is a high Fact Finder and high Follow Thru on the Kolbe Index. These individuals naturally thrive on deep research, systematic ordering, and regulatory details.

Look deeper into your organization or consider bringing in a fractional compliance specialist. If you must assign it internally as a temporary measure, the seat must still be owned by someone who is willing to take accountability for the outcomes, even if they delegate the daily tasks to a direct report. Do not split the accountability among multiple people. One person must own the seat, run its metrics, and ensure compliance Rocks are completed. This keeps your chart clean and your business protected.

Category: Accountability Chart & Seats

← All questions