tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

Our industry does not tolerate multi-year lock-in contracts, so our clients operate on month-to-month retainers. Even though our historical churn is under 4 percent, buyers keep calling this re-occurring rather than recurring and discounting our valuation. How do we prove switching costs and revenue durability to secure a true contractual recurring multiple?

Private equity buyers discount month-to-month contracts because they associate lack of legal commitment with volatility. If a customer can cancel on thirty days notice without financial penalty, the buyer assumes revenue can disappear overnight. To force a buyer to price your business like a recurring subscription model, you must demonstrate structural switching costs that outweigh the absence of a legal lock-in.

Begin by compiling five years of cohort retention data. Show gross revenue retention and net revenue retention broken out by annual vintages. If your net revenue retention consistently sits above one hundred percent, you prove that contract expansion from surviving accounts outpaces cancellations. That mathematical proof dismantles the argument that your revenue is fragile.

Next, document your operational integration. Show the buyer how deeply your services are embedded inside your client workflows.

- Map your integrations into the customer critical path, such as proprietary data feeds, shared operational scorecards, or co-managed processes.
- Present the customer replacement cost, showing that while they legally can leave in thirty days, migrating to an alternative vendor requires four months and significant retraining expense.
- Highlight historical account tenure. If your average client lifespan is seven years, point out that their commercial behavior disproves the theoretical risk of a thirty-day cancellation clause.

In your EOS V/TO, articulate this structural stickiness within your Proven Process and Guarantee. Institutional buyers do not pay for contract paper alone. They pay for high friction to leave and demonstrated customer dependence.

Category: Valuation & Deal Structure

← All questions