tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

Our business is scaling so fast that our leadership team members are constantly jumping in to solve problems outside their defined roles, creating massive confusion over who actually owns specific outcomes and leading to finger-pointing when a ball drops. How do we maintain our entrepreneurial agility without destroying our Accountability Chart?

In a fast-growing company, there is a natural temptation to play hero and jump into any fire you see. While this hustle is admirable, it quickly leads to seat creep, where multiple leaders are semi-managing the same function, and ultimately, no one is truly accountable.

To solve this without losing your entrepreneurial speed, you must enforce the rule of one name per seat on the Accountability Chart. When an issue arises, the very first question the leadership team must ask is: who owns the seat where this issue lives? If the answer is unclear, or if the role has expanded beyond the current chart, you must update the chart immediately.

Use your Level 10 Meetings to catch seat creep early. During the IDS portion, if you find that two leaders are working on the same project without clear boundaries, stop and clarify the roles. One person must own the ultimate outcome, while the other acts as a resource or implementer.

Encourage your team to collaborate, but make it clear that collaboration does not mean shared accountability. The person in the seat is the only one who can greenlight decisions or be held responsible for the results. By maintaining this discipline, you keep your agility while eliminating the confusion and finger-pointing.

Category: Leadership Team

← All questions