tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

We suspect some of our leadership team members are redefining what constitutes a qualified lead or a resolved support ticket midweek just to keep their Scorecard boxes green. How do we establish foolproof, objective criteria for our Scorecard metrics so that there is absolutely no room for subjective interpretation or data manipulation?

When team members game their weekly numbers, it is usually a sign of fear or a lack of clear definitions. If people believe that a red box on the Scorecard is a sign of personal failure rather than an objective tool to identify issues, they will find ways to manipulate the data to protect themselves. To eliminate this, you must establish an absolute, written definition for every single metric on your leadership Scorecard. This definition must be documented in your core processes and accessible to everyone. For example, do not just track qualified leads. Define a qualified lead as a prospect who meets four specific criteria, such as industry, revenue size, authority, and timeline, which are verified in your CRM. Do not just track resolved support tickets. Define a resolved ticket as one where the client has explicitly agreed the issue is fixed, and the ticket has been closed for forty eight hours without a reopen. Once these definitions are locked in, audit the data source. Every metric must have a designated path of truth, whether it is an automated dashboard or a specific manual log. During your Level 10 Meeting™, the Integrator must hold the team accountable to these definitions. If someone tries to explain away a red number by changing the criteria, drop it down to the IDS® list. Treat gaming the data as a core value issue. You cannot run a healthy business on cooked numbers.

Category: Scorecards & Data

← All questions