tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

Our project managers and shop leads constantly fight over who deals with supplier delays and vendor price negotiations, and neither wants to own the Procurement seat on the Accountability Chart. How do we place and staff a vital purchasing seat that nobody wants to touch?

When a vital function is orphaned, it is almost always because the accountability has been blurred across multiple delivery seats where people view it as a distraction from their primary work. Project managers want to hit job deadlines, and shop leads want to keep machines running. Neither wants the friction of negotiating pricing, enforcing vendor lead times, or managing return material authorizations. The solution is not to force it into an existing delivery seat as a secondary duty. That guarantees continued supply chain leaks.

First, isolate the function on the Accountability Chart. Create a dedicated Procurement and Vendor Management seat. Define its five roles around clear operational outcomes: vendor contract negotiation, supplier on-time delivery tracking, purchase order execution, material cost control, and vendor quality dispute resolution.

Second, determine reporting structure. This seat almost always sits squarely under Operations because procurement directly impacts gross margin and operational cadence. The Integrator must declare that no project manager or foreman cuts separate purchase orders without passing through this seat.

Third, solve staffing. If nobody internally has GWC for the full seat, do not force an unwilling manager into it. Look at your current team for someone with strong organizational discipline and commercial firmness who is trapped in a routine administrative seat. Alternatively, combine part-time outside procurement services with internal software automation to handle purchase orders. One person must own the number. Until a single human owns supplier accountability, your margins will continue to bleed.

Category: Accountability Chart & Seats

← All questions