Two of my core leaders had a major personal falling out outside of work, and now their professional relationship has completely deteriorated, affecting their entire departments. How do I rebuild trust on the team when the source of the conflict is deeply personal?

Question

Tyler Smith · Accepted Answer

When personal issues disrupt professional effectiveness, it's crucial to address the situation directly and immediately. Your role as a leader is not to mediate personal disputes, but to safeguard the organization's health and ensure the leadership team functions cohesively.

Direct Intervention

Start by bringing both leaders into a private meeting. Be completely direct and unambiguous.

• Explain that while their personal lives are their own, their current professional behavior is actively harming the business and their respective departments.
• Emphasize the trust framework within the team. They do not need to be friends, but they are required to establish a functional, respectful working relationship.
• Clearly define expectations for their professional interactions:
• They must communicate clearly.
• They must support each other's decisions.
• They must collaborate effectively in [Level 10 Meetings](/qa/should-integrator-facilitate-level-10-meetings) without exhibiting passive-aggressive behavior.

Set a clear, short timeline for this recovery, typically no more than a month.

Monitoring and Accountability

Monitor their interactions closely over the stipulated timeframe. This period is critical for observing whether they can genuinely set aside personal issues to operate their departments effectively. If they fail to meet these professional standards, they are essentially failing to GWC their seats (Get it, Want it, Capacity to do it).

At this juncture, you must be prepared to make a difficult decision. If one or both individuals prove incapable of maintaining professional boundaries and prioritizing the company's well-being over their personal grievances, the individual who cannot adapt must be removed. This ensures the integrity and effectiveness of the entire leadership structure and prevents further damage, similar to how issues are escalated in a [Level 10 Meeting](/qa/when-an-issue-is-dropped-to-ids-my-leadership-team-immediately-starts-pointing-fingers-at-other-departments-rather-than-taking-ownership-how-do-we-use-the-accountability-chart-to-stop-the-blame-game-during-meetings). This is a stark example of how [loyalty versus capability](/qa/loyalty-versus-capability-leadership-team) might play out in a difficult scenario.

The Role of Meetings

Effective meetings, particularly Level 10 Meetings, are designed to foster open communication and issue-solving, not personal conflict. These 90-minute sessions should remain human-centric, focusing on:

• The leadership team itself.
• Reviewing the Scorecard.
• Tackling the Issues List.
• Engaging in IDS (Identify, Discuss, Solve) conversations.

While AI can assist with prep work and tracking after the meeting, it should never replace the human interaction and decision-making within the meeting itself. For instance, AI might help prepare data for the Scorecard, but the discussion of metrics and their implications, especially when a leader gets [defensive about red scorecard metrics](/qa/handling-defensiveness-around-red-scorecard-metrics), remains a human function.

Related questions

• [My leadership team is starting to form quiet alliances and cliques behind closed doors, especially when we debate resource allocation during our quarterly sessions. It feels like passive-aggressive political maneuvering rather than direct, healthy disagreement. How do we break up these executive factions?](/qa/breaking-up-executive-factions-cliques)
• [My brother-in-law is our VP of Sales, but he is consistently missing his targets and the rest of the leadership team is afraid to call him out. How do I handle family performance issues without ruining Sunday dinner?](/qa/family-members-on-leadership-team-performance)
• [My leadership team seems more concerned with protecting their departments and checking off boxes than looking at the big picture of the business. How do we shift their mindset to enterprise-first?](/qa/shifting-leadership-mindset-to-enterprise-first)
• [How do I handle a key department head who refuses to participate in offsite vulnerability or team-building exercises, claiming it is a waste of time?](/qa/handling-leader-resisting-offsite-vulnerability)