tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

We have two highly skilled customer service reps who want to job-share a single Client Success Manager seat on our Accountability Chart. If they both GWC the seat and have a great handoff process, why does EOS say we can only have one name in a seat?

In the EOS® system, we have a hard rule: only one name can occupy a seat on the Accountability Chart. When you put two names in one seat, you instantly destroy accountability. If both employees are responsible for client success, then neither is truly responsible when a critical client churns.

If you have two highly skilled team members who want to job-share a Client Success Manager seat, you cannot simply write both names in that single box. Instead, you must split the seat structurally. You can do this by dividing the responsibilities geographically, by client tier, or by shift times.

For example, you can create two distinct seats on your Accountability Chart: Client Success Manager - Tier A and Client Success Manager - Tier B. Each seat has its own identical five roles, but the scope of work is clearly defined. One person sits in each seat, and each is fully accountable for their specific metrics and Rocks.

This structural split preserves absolute accountability while allowing you to leverage the talents of both team members. It also shows a potential buyer that your operations are scalable and clearly defined, rather than relying on an informal, cooperative agreement between two employees that would collapse if one of them left the company.

Category: Accountability Chart & Seats

← All questions