Our largest customer accounts for thirty-five percent of our revenue, and buyers are threatening to slash our valuation because of it. How do we structure the deal or present the operations to protect our enterprise value?

Question

Tyler Smith · Accepted Answer

Customer concentration is a common concern for buyers, particularly when a single customer accounts for over 30% of your revenue. This creates a binary risk where the loss of that client could severely impact the business, leading buyers to slash your valuation. However, proactive measures can protect your enterprise value.

Operational Integration

The most effective way to mitigate customer concentration risk is to demonstrate deep operational integration with your largest customer. This involves proving that your business is not easily replaceable.

Consider highlighting:

• Systems integration: Are your internal systems directly linked to theirs?
• Proprietary technology: Do you use or provide custom technology that is critical to their operations?
• Custom workflows: Have you developed unique processes or workflows specifically for this client that are embedded in their daily activities?

The goal is to show buyers that switching providers would be incredibly difficult and expensive for your key customer.

You can also use an [Accountability Chart](/qa/thinking-time-accountability-chart-exit-prep) to illustrate that the customer relationship is managed by a professional team, rather than being solely dependent on the owner. This demonstrates a more robust and sustainable approach to client management. For instance, clearly defining the Head of Sales seat or Account Management seat can reassure buyers that the relationship is systematized.

Deal Structure

Beyond operational measures, the deal structure itself can be adapted to protect your enterprise value. Buyers may be more amenable to a higher valuation if they are assured of the key customer's retention post-acquisition.

Strategies include:

• Higher percentage of purchase price in a structured format: This could involve:
• Localized earnout: A portion of the purchase price is contingent on the revenue or profitability generated from that specific customer over a defined period.
• Joint rollover equity arrangement: A portion of your equity rolls into the new entity, with its value tied to the retention and performance of the concentrated customer account.
• Aligned incentives: These structures align your incentives with the buyer's, demonstrating your confidence in the account's stability and future performance.

By combining strong operational systems that secure the client with a flexible deal structure, you can effectively offset the concentration risk and preserve your valuation during negotiations.

Related questions

• [How should an owner use Thinking Time to design the next iteration of the Accountability Chart for an exit?](/qa/thinking-time-accountability-chart-exit-prep)
• [I want to sell my business in three years but I am currently stuck in the Sales and Marketing seat, and I cannot afford a high-priced replacement yet. How do I transition out?](/qa/stuck-in-sales-seat-before-exit)
• [How do we assign ownership when nobody wants it on our Accountability Chart?](/qa/how-to-fill-unwanted-seats-accountability-chart)
• [We are preparing for an exit and want to run an AI-powered operation, but we do not know how to redefine the major roles of our existing seats to reflect these automated workflows. How do we rewrite the roles on the Accountability Chart when AI takes over the repetitive tasks?](/qa/ai-operations-accountability-chart-roles)
• [Our investment bankers are asking for a traditional organizational chart with titles and reporting lines for our pitch deck, but we only have an EOS Accountability Chart. How do we present this to potential buyers during an exit process?](/qa/accountability-chart-versus-traditional-org-chart-for-exit)