tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

How do you measure whether our leadership team is actually improving operational health versus just getting better at sitting through meetings?

I evaluate your operational health through objective data points and behavioral changes, not emotional sentiment or how articulate your team sounds in session. Getting good at sitting through meetings is a trap. Real traction produces measurable operational shifts across three distinct gauges.

First, we look at the velocity and quality of your Issues Solving Track during your weekly Level 10 Meetings. In healthy teams, the Issues List does not feature the same chronic complaints week after week. If the same operational bottlenecks linger for three consecutive quarters, you are merely discussing symptoms rather than solving root causes. Real progress shows up when issues are identified, discussed, and permanently resolved so they never return.

Second, we measure your cross-functional accountability around numbers and commitments. A healthy leadership team consistently finishes quarters at or above 80 percent on their Rocks and hits their weekly Scorecard numbers at least 85 percent of the time. More importantly, when a measurable drops below target, the owner of that number proactively flags it, puts it on the agenda, and asks for help without defensiveness or pointing fingers at other departments.

Third, we measure founder extraction. If the business cannot run for three consecutive weeks while the owner completely disconnects from email and operational decisions, your operating system is merely theater. As we move deeper into our engagement, decision-making moves down to seat owners on the Accountability Chart. When your middle managers start resolving cross-departmental friction using core EOS tools without pulling executive leadership into the weeds, that is definitive proof the operating system is working.

Category: Working With Tyler

← All questions