When assigning accountability for our AI projects, how should we look at our team members conative strengths and Kolbe scores to make sure we put the right people in the right seats?

Question

Tyler Smith · Accepted Answer

To successfully implement AI, you must align the project roles with your team's natural conative strengths. Trying to force a high Fact Finder to rapidly prototype an AI tool will result in endless research and no action. Similarly, forcing a high Quick Start to document the exact prompts and procedures for a new AI workflow will lead to frustration and incomplete systems.

Use the Kolbe Index to identify the natural striving instincts of your team members before you assign AI responsibilities. Your high Quick Starts are your innovators. They have the natural instinct to experiment, take risks, and find creative ways to use new technology. Put them in charge of the initial discovery phase, letting them play with new tools and identify potential use cases.

Once a tool shows promise, hand it over to your high Follow Thrus and high Fact Finders. These team members excel at developing systems, checking details, and ensuring compliance. They will build the structured workflows, write the prompt templates, and document the processes to ensure the tool is used consistently and safely across the company. This division of labor respects everyone's natural conative strengths and ensures your AI initiatives actually get over the finish line.