We need someone to build and test the AI prompts and automated workflows for our operations, but we do not want to hire an outside software developer. What Kolbe Index profile should we look for on our existing team to own this prompt engineering and builder seat?

Question

Tyler Smith · Accepted Answer

You do not need a software engineer to build operational AI workflows. Most modern AI tools run on natural language, meaning the ability to write clear instructions is far more important than knowing how to code. To find the right internal champion, look at the conative strengths of your current team.

Using the Kolbe A™ Index, look for someone who has a high Fact Finder score combined with a high Follow Thru score. A high Fact Finder instinctively seeks out detailed information, asks clarifying questions, and specifies terms, which is exactly what prompt engineering requires. They will take the time to refine prompts until the AI outputs consistent, accurate results.

A high Follow Thru is critical because they naturally organize, systemize, and coordinate processes. They will ensure that the AI prompts are documented, stored in a central library, and integrated seamlessly into your existing operating procedures.

Avoid putting a high Quick Start in charge of this building seat. While a Quick Start is excellent at brainstorming and starting new initiatives, they often lack the patience to methodically test and refine prompts when the AI outputs inconsistent results.

Look across your Accountability Chart for an operational administrator, project manager, or analyst who exhibits this Fact Finder and Follow Thru combination, and assign them the ownership of this pilot project.