We want to create a new, dedicated AI Operator seat on our Accountability Chart to oversee our automated workflows, but we are arguing over whether this person needs to be a highly technical coder or a practical integrator. How do we use the Kolbe A™ Index to identify the natural conative strengths required for this role?

Question

Tyler Smith · Accepted Answer

As your business integrates more automated workflows, you will eventually need a dedicated AI Operator seat on your Accountability Chart to keep these systems running. If you try to hire a pure software developer for this role, you may end up with someone who wants to write custom code from scratch rather than leveraging existing tools to solve immediate operational problems.

To find the perfect fit, use the Kolbe A™ Index to evaluate the conative strengths required for this seat. You need a specific profile that balances technical capability with operational execution:
- Fact Finder: You need a moderate to high score, typically a five or six. This person must be able to research system documentations, understand APIs, and analyze data flows without getting bogged down in endless research.
- Follow Thru: You need a very high score, typically a seven or eight. This seat requires a systematic mind to build, document, and maintain highly structured automation pipelines. If they lack Follow Thru, your automated workflows will constantly break due to neglected updates.
- Quickstart: You need a moderate score, around a four or five. They must be willing to experiment with new AI tools and adapt to rapid technological shifts, but not so high that they constantly disrupt stable processes with the next shiny tool.
- Implementor: A low to moderate score is ideal, as this role deals primarily with digital systems and abstract workflows rather than physical materials.

Look for an operator who loves systems, thrives on efficiency, and has the conative drive to build stable, documented processes.