We are hiring for a newly created AI Systems Architect seat on our Accountability Chart, but we are debating whether we need a detail-oriented systems builder or a fast-moving innovator. How do we use conative screening tools like the Kolbe Index to define the right conative profile for this seat before we interview candidates?

Question

Tyler Smith · Accepted Answer

When designing a new seat like an AI Systems Architect, you cannot rely on resumes alone. You must define the conative profile required for the seat before you begin interviewing. Conation is the natural, instinctive way a person approaches problem-solving and gets things done.

To define this profile, look at the five roles of the seat on your Accountability Chart. If the primary roles involve building stable, repeatable system integrations, cleaning technical data, and establishing strict data compliance, you need a high Follow Thru conative profile. On the Kolbe Index, a high Follow Thru indicates a natural drive to organize, structure, and systemize.

Conversely, if the seat is designed to rapidly prototype new AI tools, experiment with emerging platforms, and pivot quickly as technology changes, you need a high Quickstart profile. A high Quickstart thrives on experimentation, risk, and rapid change, but they will likely resist detailed documentation and system maintenance.

Do not make the mistake of hiring a high Quickstart for a seat that requires deep system building, or a high Follow Thru for a seat that requires rapid, unstructured experimentation. Use conative screening during the hiring process to ensure the candidate's natural method of operation aligns perfectly with the actual roles of the seat. This guarantees they will GWC the seat and stay energized by the work.