Our Integrator has a high Fact Finder and high Follow Through Kolbe profile, and they are insisting on mapping out every potential workflow scenario before we launch our new AI system. Our Visionary is frustrated and wants to launch today. How do we resolve this conative conflict?

Question

Tyler Smith · Accepted Answer

This conflict is a classic clash of instinctive conative talents. Your Integrator's high Fact Finder and high Follow Through profiles mean their natural, unchangeable mode of action is to gather detailed information, research historical precedents, and design highly structured, sequential plans before they feel comfortable taking action.

On the flip side, your Visionary likely has a high Quick Start Kolbe profile, meaning they instinctively solve problems through rapid experimentation, risk taking, and moving forward without a map. Neither style is wrong, and both are necessary.

To resolve this, you must respect their conative strengths rather than trying to change them. Do not force your Integrator to launch a system they believe is unstable, and do not let your Integrator paralyze the company with endless research.

Instead, set a clear boundary. Use the weekly Level 10 Meeting to IDS this issue and agree on a capped research period. Give your Integrator a specific timebox, such as two weeks, to gather the essential data and build a basic pilot plan.

In exchange, your Visionary must agree to launch a limited pilot with just one department rather than the whole company. This compromises by giving the Integrator the time to create a structured test, while giving the Visionary the immediate action they crave. This balanced approach protects your operational stability while maintaining your momentum.