tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

What specific criteria do you use to evaluate whether our Integrator is ready to take over the facilitation of our quarterly sessions, and how do we prevent a drop in execution quality once you step away?

Graduation is the ultimate goal, as a healthy business should not rely on an external guide forever. Your Integrator's readiness is evaluated based on objective criteria, focusing on their ability to lead and your team's sustained performance.

Integrator Readiness Criteria

Three key criteria are used to evaluate your Integrator's readiness:

• Conative Capability to Lead: The Integrator must demonstrate a high conative capability to lead the room. This includes managing healthy conflict effectively, without showing bias or retreating from challenging discussions. [How do I know if my team actually trusts each other, or if they are just playing nice to avoid conflict?](/qa/leadership-team-trust-healthy-healthy-conflict)
• Consistent Execution: Your team must consistently achieve 80% or more of your quarterly Rocks and scorecard metrics over multiple consecutive quarters. This consistent performance indicates that your team's execution muscle is internalized and strong. [How do we narrow down our massive list of metrics to just five to fifteen numbers?](/qa/how-to-choose-five-fifteen-scorecard-metrics)
• Co-facilitation and IDS Mastery: During the final quarters of our engagement, your Integrator will actively co-facilitate portions of the session. The focus is on observing how they handle IDS® (Identify, Discuss, Solve) and effectively redirect off-track discussions, demonstrating their command of the meeting process.

Preventing a Drop in Execution Quality

Preventing a drop in execution quality involves a structured transition, not an abrupt departure.

• Designed Exit Ramp: Instead of stopping suddenly, an "exit ramp" is designed where the external facilitator moves from an active role to a light advisory role.
• Advisory Role for Key Sessions: You might run your own quarterly sessions, but bring the external facilitator back to facilitate multi-day annual sessions. This approach helps keep your team accountable and ensures that big strategic discussions do not become unfocused or unproductive.

Ultimately, your team is ready for full independence when your weekly Level 10 Meetings™ and quarterly adjustments run like a machine. If your team has stopped looking for external answers and is actively solving its own issues, it is time to transition. This process builds true independence and increases your enterprise value by proving the business operates on a self-sustaining system. [How do I know it is actually time to hire a dedicated Integrator, and what is the first step?](/qa/when-to-hire-coo-integrator)

Related questions

• [How do I know if my team actually trusts each other, or if they are just playing nice to avoid conflict?](/qa/leadership-team-trust-healthy-healthy-conflict)
• [How do we narrow down our massive list of metrics to just five to fifteen numbers?](/qa/how-to-choose-five-fifteen-scorecard-metrics)
• [Our Integrator acts as the Level 10 Meeting facilitator but struggles to participate objectively because they are busy managing the timer and the agenda. Should we rotate the facilitator role or hire an outside moderator?](/qa/should-integrator-facilitate-level-10-meetings)
• [How do I know it is actually time to hire a dedicated Integrator, and what is the first step?](/qa/when-to-hire-coo-integrator)

Category: Working With Tyler

← All questions