We want to use AI to draft our weekly Level 10 Meeting agendas and summarize our IDS sessions, but we are worried it will ruin the human connection and accountability. How do we integrate AI without losing the core discipline?

Question

Tyler Smith · Accepted Answer

Using AI to streamline your Level 10 Meeting™ administration is an excellent way to run an efficient operation, but you must establish clear boundaries to protect human accountability. You can successfully use AI tools to transcribe your meetings, draft the weekly To-Do list, and summarize the agreed-upon action steps. This automation reduces administrative drag and allows your leadership team to remain fully engaged in the room instead of getting distracted by typing notes. However, the ownership of those metrics, Rocks, and To-Dos must remain strictly human. An AI tool can track that a task was assigned, but it cannot look your peers in the eye during the meeting and report whether a To-Do is done or not done. That moment of mutual peer pressure is the core engine of accountability in EOS®. Additionally, do not allow AI to summarize the nuance of your IDS® discussions into comfortable, generic bullet points. The real value of identifying, discussing, and solving problems lies in the productive friction and honest debate among your leadership team. Use AI to handle the data ingestion, like pulling performance metrics directly into your weekly Scorecard, but keep the critical thinking, decision-making, and human vulnerability strictly in the hands of your leadership team.