tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

We recently acquired a smaller competitor and now have two complete leadership teams and two parallel organizational structures. How do we integrate these two distinct Accountability Charts into a single, cohesive structure without triggering a turf war?

Integrating an acquisition is a high-stakes operational test. If you try to merge two teams by smashing their existing organizational charts together, you will create a redundant, politicized mess.

You must start with a blank canvas and design a single Accountability Chart for the combined entity. Focus entirely on the needs of the newly expanded business. Decide how many seats you need in sales, operations, finance, and marketing to hit your new target on the V/TO.

Once the ideal structure is locked, you must objectively evaluate the leaders from both companies for the available seats. Do not automatically give legacy seats to your original team members out of loyalty. Use the GWC tool and Predictive Index assessments to evaluate every candidate for every seat on the new leadership team.

This process requires radical candor and vulnerability, matching the trust-building principles in the Trusted Advisor Fieldbook. You must prioritize personal connection and open communication during this transition. Let both teams know that the selection process is based entirely on core values fit and GWC, not on tenure or previous titles.

By choosing the right person for the right seat objectively, you build a high-performance culture from day one and eliminate the toxic us versus them mentality that destroys so many merged companies.

Category: Accountability Chart & Seats

← All questions