tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

Our leadership team starts the quarter aligned on our Rocks, but by week six we regularly experience scope creep or unexpected market changes that tempt us to abandon or change them. How do we keep our quarterly Rocks on track to completion without ignoring legitimate operational shifts?

Completing quarterly Rocks requires a strict boundary between strategy and operations. Mid-quarter pivots are often just reactions to temporary fires, not actual structural changes in your market. To prevent your Rocks from being derailed by scope creep, you must apply a high standard of discipline to how you define them during your quarterly planning sessions. Every Rock must be written with clear, binary milestones so there is no ambiguity about what done looks like.

If an unexpected opportunity or market shift occurs mid-quarter, do not automatically abandon your current Rocks. Instead, place the new issue on your weekly Issues List. Use your Level 10 Meeting™ to debate the impact of making a change. If you must pivot, it requires a conscious decision by the entire leadership team to kill or shelve an active Rock, recognizing the cost of doing so. You cannot just pile new priorities on top of existing ones.

Additionally, protect your leadership team's capacity by limiting each member to no more than three Rocks per quarter. By keeping the number of priorities small and enforcing the touch-it-once rule on operational communications, you free up the mental bandwidth required to see your Rocks through to completion. Focus on finishing what you start before chasing the next objective.

Category: EOS Implementation

← All questions