Our weekly operations depend on collaboration across multiple departments, but our team is arguing over who should own our core fulfillment metric on the scorecard. How do we assign single-seat ownership when three different departments touch the process?
Scorecard ownership is not about who does all the physical work. It is about who is ultimately accountable for the result. When multiple departments touch a process, you must look at your Accountability Chart and identify the one seat that has the authority to solve the problem when the number goes red.
For example, if fulfillment requires sales to input clean data, operations to build the product, and shipping to send it, your Operations Director must own the fulfillment metric. They cannot point fingers at sales or shipping. If sales is inputting bad data, the Operations Director must use the Level 10 Meeting to raise the issue and work with the Sales Director to fix the upstream process.
Assigning shared ownership of a scorecard metric guarantees that nobody actually owns it. When a number is shared, blame becomes the default response. One person must own the number on the weekly scorecard. That owner is responsible for reporting the number, explaining why it is off target, and bringing it to the Issues List.
If a seat owner truly cannot control the outcome because of upstream issues, then you need to break the metric down into leading indicators for each department. Sales owns clean order handoffs. Operations owns production time. Shipping owns dock-to-door speed. But the high-level fulfillment metric still belongs to the Operations Director. They are the single point of accountability.
Category: Scorecards & Data