tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

We have an executive who consistently hits their scorecard numbers and solves operational issues, but they repeatedly violate our core values by belittling peers. How do we handle this seat?

You are dealing with the classic Right Seat, Wrong Person scenario. This individual passes GWC for their seat, but fails the core values test on the People Analyzer. They deliver technical performance, but their behavior damages the culture, suppresses open communication, and causes other talented employees to consider leaving.

Tolerating a high performer who violates core values destroys leadership credibility. When other employees see leadership tolerate toxic behavior simply because the individual hits their revenue or production targets, they conclude that your stated core values are meaningless slogans.

You must address this directly using the three-strike process. Sit down with the executive in a private meeting. Present clear, objective examples where their actions violated specific core values. Set an explicit standard for behavioral change, with a thirty-day review timeline.

Make it clear that maintaining their seat on the Accountability Chart requires both cultural alignment and operational execution. If they improve permanently, the issue is resolved. If they revert to belittling colleagues or dismiss the feedback, you must remove them from the organization.

No single seat or scorecard metric is worth the cultural erosion caused by keeping the wrong person in your company. Replacing them will immediately improve team cohesion and velocity.

Category: Accountability Chart & Seats

← All questions