If our leadership team enters a quarterly session with a 60 percent Rock completion rate, how do you handle that failure during the review?

We treat a 60 percent completion rate as an operational failure, not an acceptable variation. In EOS®, the standard is achieving 80 percent or higher of your quarterly Rocks. Consistently hitting 60 percent means your team is either setting unrealistic goals, failing to prioritize, or running sloppy weekly Level 10 Meetings.

During the Rock review portion of the session, we grade each commitment strictly as complete or incomplete. There is no partial credit for an objective that is 90 percent done. If the deliverable is not completely finished according to its original definition of done, it is marked dropped or off track. We do not allow leaders to tell stories, explain away delays, or defend their workload during this portion of the agenda.

Once the review is finished and the 60 percent number is visible on the board, we push the systemic failure directly to the Issues List for IDS®. During the afternoon, we isolate the exact breakdown:
- Did the team take on too many Rocks instead of focusing on three to seven vital priorities?
- Did unexpected operational fires derail progress, indicating weak delegation or missing standard operating procedures?
- Did the Integrator fail to hold leaders accountable during weekly Level 10 Meetings throughout the quarter?
- Are certain executives lacking the capacity or discipline required by their seat on the Accountability Chart?

We solve the underlying operational breakdown so the team does not repeat the pattern in the subsequent quarter.

Category: Working With Tyler