We are transitioning to EOS and designing our first Accountability Chart. Several legacy managers who previously had direct reports are now in individual contributor seats. How do we handle their feeling of being demoted?
This is one of the most sensitive parts of the Accountability Chart transition. Legacy structures often equate management with status, leading to a company of bloated management layers where managers do not actually manage well. You must reframe the conversation entirely. Explain to your team that the Accountability Chart is not an organization chart. It is not about hierarchy, status, or career ladders. It is about identifying the functions required to run a healthy, growing business. Sit down with each affected manager individually. Focus on the distinction between management capability and technical capability. Many brilliant technical experts make terrible managers because they lack the conative drive or desire to lead, manage, and hold people accountable. Show them how their new individual contributor seat allows them to focus on their unique ability. Highlight how freeing them from administrative management tasks will actually increase their impact and value to the company. Align their compensation with their output, not the number of direct reports they have. In a healthy EOS company, a top individual contributor can make more than their manager. If they still cannot get past the loss of status, they may be valuing their title over the health of the organization. This indicates a core values issue. You must be prepared to make the tough right-person-right-seat call if their attitude begins to poison the culture.
Category: Accountability Chart & Seats