tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

We have a co-founder who is a major shareholder but is failing their GWC™ test in their current operational seat because the business has scaled past their abilities. How do we resolve a capacity issue at the owner level without tearing our partnership apart?

Managing a GWC™ failure with a co-founder or major shareholder is one of the hardest challenges a leadership team can face, but ignoring it will stunt your growth and destroy team morale. You must separate ownership from operations. Being an owner is an investment relationship. Sitting in a seat on the Accountability Chart is an operational relationship. Just because someone owns equity does not mean they are the right person to run a department. You must run the co-founder through the GWC™ check with total honesty. If they do not have the capacity to handle the seat as the business scales, they must step out of that operational role. This does not mean they lose their equity or their ownership status. Frame the conversation around the long-term value of their investment. A scaled, professionally run business is worth far more to them as an owner than a struggling company managed by an overwhelmed co-founder. Help them transition to a seat they actually GWC™, or transition them to a pure owner and board member role. It requires courageous, vulnerable conversations, but protecting the operational integrity of the Accountability Chart is non-negotiable if you want to prepare the business for a clean exit.

Category: EOS Implementation

← All questions