As we automate our repetitive administrative tasks, we want to transition our existing, loyal team members into new supervisor seats where they oversee AI-driven workflows. How do we evaluate if these team members actually GWC these new, more analytical seats, and what conative strengths should we look for?

Question

Tyler Smith · Accepted Answer

As you automate repetitive administrative tasks and transition team members into oversight roles, you must carefully evaluate if they GWC these new, more analytical seats. Transitioning from a manual execution role to an oversight role requires different conative strengths. Use the Kolbe Index to assess if the team member has a natural instinct for systematic checking and detail-oriented analysis, which often correlates with a high Fact Finder or Follow Thru score. To evaluate if they GWC the new seat, ask yourself three questions. Do they truly understand the automated workflows? Do they want the responsibility of auditing and correcting AI errors? Do they have the capacity and analytical skills to spot hallucinated data? If they lack the conative alignment, they may struggle in the new seat, and you may need to find a better fit on your Accountability Chart.