tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

Our long-tenured Engineering Director is a stellar culture fit, but as we move to cloud-native architectures, they clearly lack the technical capability to lead the new seat, though they insist they can learn it. How do we handle this GWC™ call when the "Get It" part is missing due to rapid tech changes?

This is one of the hardest calls an owner has to make, but you must decouple love from capability. The GWC™ tool is binary: yes or no. There is no such thing as a partial yes.

The "Get It" component of GWC™ refers to the innate wiring and deep understanding required for the seat. If your company is moving to cloud-native architectures and your director does not have the technical depth to lead that strategy, they do not get the seat. Wishing, hoping, or sending them to a boot camp will not change their natural cognitive limits or the speed of your industry.

Insisting they can learn it is a trap. It delays the inevitable while your business falls behind. You must have an honest, compassionate, yet firm conversation. Let them know they are a valued core values fit, but the requirements of this specific seat have evolved past their current capabilities.

Look at your Accountability Chart for another seat where they do GWC™ the roles. This might be a legacy engineering seat, an advisory role, or a customer-facing technical support seat. If a suitable seat does not exist, you must help them transition out of the company with dignity. Keeping someone in a seat where they are set up to fail is not kind; it is weak leadership.

Category: Accountability Chart & Seats

← All questions