Our Operations Director has been with us for ten years and is a perfect culture fit, but as we transition to an AI-driven logistics platform, he is failing to keep up with the technical demands. He gets the role and wants it, but lacks the capacity to manage automated systems. How do we make this tough GWC call?
One of the hardest decisions an owner has to make is addressing a long-term, loyal employee who is a perfect culture fit but can no longer keep up with the scale of the business. As you transition to an AI-driven platform, your Operations Director must have the technical capacity to manage automated systems.
When you apply the GWC™ tool, you must be brutally honest. He gets the role conceptually, and he wants the seat, but he lacks the cognitive or technical Capacity to manage a modern, automated supply chain. Capacity is not just about hours worked; it is about intelligence, skills, experience, and emotional capability.
You cannot compromise on the Capacity filter of GWC™ just because of history or loyalty. Keeping someone in a seat they cannot perform is unfair to them, frustrating for their team, and a massive bottleneck for your exit preparation.
The solution is to find a seat where he does GWC™. This often means pulling him out of the leadership-level Operations Director seat and placing him in an individual contributor seat, such as Client Relations or Vendor Management. In this new seat, his deep industry experience and cultural alignment can shine without holding back your operational technology.
If no such seat exists, you must help him transition out of the business with dignity, respect, and a generous severance package.
Category: Accountability Chart & Seats