tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

As our company scales, our founding CEO is struggling in the Integrator seat because the operational demands have outgrown their skill set, but they are resistant to stepping down. How do we use the GWC™ and Accountability Chart™ tools to navigate this transition without causing an organizational crisis?

When a company outgrows its founders, it is one of the most painful transitions in business. However, keeping a leader in a seat they do not GWC™ is a disservice to both the company and the individual.

To resolve this, you must separate the owner's equity from their seat on the Accountability Chart™. A founder can own the company, but they do not automatically own the right to manage its operations if they lack the skill set required for the scaling business.

Start by having an honest, objective conversation using the GWC™ framework. Walk through the roles and responsibilities of the Integrator seat and evaluate whether they truly get it, want it, and have the capacity to do it at this scale. If the answer to any of those three is no, they must step out of that seat.

The founder may be better suited for the Visionary seat, or perhaps a seat on the board of directors. By using the Accountability Chart™ as your guide, you remove the emotion from the decision and focus entirely on what the business needs to survive. It is about putting the right people in the right seats, even when the wrong person is the owner.

Category: EOS Implementation

← All questions