Our leadership team agreed that we need a dedicated Quality Assurance and Field Compliance seat, but nobody in the room wants to take it because it carries high stress and zero glamour. How do we fill an essential seat that no existing leader wants to own?
When an essential seat goes unwanted, leadership teams usually make one of two mistakes. They either assign it to an unwilling leader who lets it rot, or they scatter the five roles across three different seats, creating zero accountability.
Under EOS, every seat must have one name, and that person must Want It. Forcing an existing executive into a seat they despise guarantees poor execution and resentment.
Start by auditing why nobody wants the seat. Often, unglamorous seats like Quality Assurance or Field Compliance lack authority. Leaders avoid them because they are handed pure accountability for failures without the authority to enforce standards across operations. Redefine the five roles on the Accountability Chart so the seat holds genuine decision-making power.
If the seat is properly scoped and your existing team still lacks anyone who genuinely Wants It, stop trying to shoehorn internal talent. Treat the seat as an open vacancy. Appoint an interim owner, usually the Integrator, whose sole objective for that seat is not to run it forever, but to build the operating rhythm, document the core processes, and hire the permanent right person.
An unglamorous seat is often the most critical lever for enterprise valuation and risk mitigation. If nobody internally wants the accountability, go to the market and hire someone who views that discipline as their career specialty.
Category: Accountability Chart & Seats