tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

We have hired an outside agency to rebuild our entire operational workflow with AI integrations, but they are constantly bypassing our internal Head of Technology and going straight to our employees. How do we place an external vendor or agency on our Accountability Chart to maintain a clean reporting structure?

An outside vendor or agency should never be allowed to bypass your internal leadership team and interact directly with your employees without clear boundaries. This creates chaos, dilutes accountability, and destroys operational efficiency. You must manage external partners through a single owner on your Accountability Chart.

Look at your Accountability Chart and determine which internal seat is ultimately accountable for the results the agency is supposed to deliver. In this case, since the agency is rebuilding your operational workflows using AI integrations, they must report directly to your internal Head of Technology or Head of Operations.

The external agency does not get its own box on your internal Accountability Chart. Instead, the name of your internal leader goes in the box, and that leader is held accountable for managing the agency's deliverables, budget, and timeline. The agency reports directly to that leader, and that leader alone.

Establish a clear rule: any communication, workflow changes, or employee training initiated by the agency must be routed through and approved by the accountable internal seat holder first. This keeps your internal reporting structure clean, prevents employee confusion, and ensures your team is not pulled in multiple directions by outside contractors.

Category: Accountability Chart & Seats

← All questions