tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

We are building our first Accountability Chart and my cofounder and I are constantly stepping on each other's toes. How do we clearly define the boundary between the Visionary and Integrator roles when we both have our hands in everything?

The conflict between a Visionary and an Integrator™ is one of the most common friction points in growing companies. It usually happens because roles are poorly defined, leading to overlapping authority and team confusion.

To solve this, you must run both partners through a Kolbe A Index assessment. This tool measures your innate, conative ways of taking action. Typically, the Visionary scores high in Quick Start, constantly generating ideas and pushing for change, while the Integrator™ scores higher in Follow Thru, focus, and execution. Recognizing these natural drives helps you understand why you clash.

Next, build a clear Accountability Chart that separates the two seats. The Visionary seat is responsible for big ideas, key relationships, and industry research. The Integrator™ seat is responsible for running the daily business, executing the business plan, and holding the leadership team accountable.

Establish the rules of engagement. The Integrator™ has final decision-making power over operational issues. The Visionary must respect this boundary and stop going around the Integrator™ to direct staff. If the Visionary has a new idea, it goes on the Issues List for the next meeting, rather than being deployed immediately. This structure protects the team from whiplash and allows both partners to operate in their unique strengths.

Category: EOS Implementation

← All questions