tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

We are preparing a sell-side Quality of Earnings report ahead of going to market, but our advisory team is aggressive with pro-forma adjustments like owner compensation normalization and software deployment costs. How do we validate and defend these EBITDA add-backs so a buy-side diligence team does not dismantle them?

Buy-side Quality of Earnings teams generate their fees by discrediting seller add-backs. If your pro-forma adjustments rely on speculative assertions rather than defensible financial proof, the buyer's accountants will strip them out, driving down your adjusted EBITDA and slashing your valuation multiple. To defend your numbers, every single add-back must be supported by an institutional audit trail.

For owner compensation normalization, do not simply estimate what a replacement executive would cost. Map your departing owner's day-to-day functions directly onto your EOS Accountability Chart. Show exactly which responsibilities will be absorbed by your existing Leadership Team and which seats require a new hire. Back up the proposed replacement salary using recognized, third-party executive compensation benchmarking data for your specific industry, geography, and revenue scale.

For non-recurring expenses like a custom software migration, establish a discrete project file. Provide the original software development agreements, detailed contractor invoices, and documentation proving the implementation is complete and will not recur as an ongoing maintenance cost. If an expense reflects routine operational software enhancements, do not categorize it as an add-back; buy-side diligence will immediately reclassify it into operational overhead.

Transparency creates leverage in M&A diligence. By presenting rigorously documented, conservative add-backs inside a credible sell-side Quality of Earnings report, you set the baseline for negotiation. When the data is mathematically sound and operationally verified, you shift the burden of proof to the buyer, preventing last-minute valuation haircuts during final contract negotiations.

Category: Valuation & Deal Structure

← All questions