tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

During our buy-side Quality of Earnings review, the auditor is trying to write off our high-margin specialized consulting revenue as one-off project work rather than ongoing operational earnings. How do we defend this revenue classification to preserve our normalized EBITDA?

Buy-side auditors look for any excuse to discount your earnings by classifying recurring project revenue as transactional or one time events. To defend your normalized EBITDA during a Quality of Earnings review, you must prove that your specialized consulting revenue is highly systemized and predictable. Do not rely on generic financial statements. Instead, present the auditor with your V/TO® which clearly outlines your niche and proven process. Show them the operational reality through your customer onboarding data and historical retention cohorts. If your specialized projects follow a repeatable lifecycle with the same clients year after year, document this sequence. You want to demonstrate that while the individual scope of work documents might change, the client relationships and the monthly resource utilization remain constant. This is where your weekly Scorecard becomes invaluable. By presenting historical data showing consistent utilization rates and repeatable customer acquisition costs, you transition the conversation from volatile project work to predictable, systemized delivery. Force the auditor to see that your delivery model is a repeatable engine, not a series of lucky, one off sales. This operational proof is what keeps those earnings in the adjusted EBITDA calculation.

Category: Valuation & Deal Structure

← All questions