tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

During the period between LOI and close, the buyer is accusing us of underfunding our capital expenditures and is demanding we pre-fund a post-close equipment reserve. How do we use our long-term V/TO and Rocks to prove our maintenance capital expenditures are fully optimized and prevent a last-minute price reduction?

Last-minute demands for capital expenditure reserves are a common tactic used by buyers to claw back value just before closing. They will claim that your equipment, technology, or facilities are outdated and require immediate investment. To defeat this, you must present a detailed, historical record of your operational efficiency and strategic planning. Pull out your long-term V/TO® and show the buyer how your capital expenditures have been systematically aligned with your three-year picture and one-year plan. Highlight the specific Rocks your team completed to upgrade and maintain your infrastructure over the past several years. Back this up with your operational metrics, proving that your maintenance schedules have kept your downtime near zero and your capacity utilization high. If your systems are heavily automated or run on AI-driven workflows, demonstrate how this technology reduces the physical wear and tear on your equipment, justifying your lower CapEx spend. Show them that your lean operating model is a deliberate strategy, not a sign of deferred maintenance. By aligning your financial records with your strategic EOS® tools, you transform a subjective argument about CapEx into an objective proof of operational excellence, successfully protecting your purchase price.

Category: Valuation & Deal Structure

← All questions