tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

During confirmatory diligence, the buyer discovered that several of our operational systems rely on legacy custom software and is demanding a seven-figure purchase price reduction to pay for modern upgrades. How do we resolve technical diligence findings without caving to a retrade?

A technical diligence finding is one of the most common pretexts buyers use to re-trade purchase price late in the transaction. When a buyer discovers outdated software, legacy codebase, or deferred tech infrastructure, their immediate instinct is to demand a cash deduction at close. You do not have to accept that haircut.

First, challenge the premise that legacy infrastructure has impacted operational performance. If your existing systems reliably delivered historical revenue and EBITDA with low downtime, the software is fully fit for purpose. Present your operational metrics, system uptime logs, and delivery scorecards to prove that current systems generate the very cash flows the buyer agreed to purchase.

Second, separate mandatory operational maintenance from discretionary technological upgrades. If the buyer plans to rewrite your applications to integrate them into their enterprise stack, that is a synergy investment they must fund themselves, not a defect in your historical operations.

Third, if legitimate technical debt exists, offer a performance escrow or conditional holdback rather than an outright valuation cut. Place a capped portion of the purchase price into an escrow account releasable upon completing specific infrastructure upgrades over twelve months post-close. If the modernization costs less than expected, remaining funds revert back to you.

Finally, be prepared to test their resolve. Buyers who have invested hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal and accounting diligence do not want to walk away over negotiable software modernization. Run the issue through an objective Level 10 Meeting framework, establish your bottom line, and tell the buyer to proceed or release exclusivity.

Category: Valuation & Deal Structure

← All questions