tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

We have three regional sales managers who all use our centralized sales tracking system, but the data entry is inconsistent and our pipeline reports are full of errors. Since they all use the software, how do we assign accountability for data hygiene?

When everyone is responsible for data quality, nobody is responsible. This is a common failure point in companies that share software platforms. To fix this, you must apply the EOS rule of having only one name in a seat and one person accountable for any given system.

While all three regional sales managers must enter their data, they cannot share accountability for the system's integrity. You must create or identify a single seat on your Accountability Chart that owns the CRM data hygiene. This is often a Sales Operations or Sales Administrator seat reporting directly to the Head of Sales.

The five core roles for this CRM seat must clearly include maintaining data accuracy, training team members, and auditing system inputs. The person in this seat is the gatekeeper. They do not do all the data entry themselves, but they are accountable for ensuring that the sales managers follow the standard operating procedures.

If a regional manager fails to enter data correctly, the CRM seat owner has the authority to flag the error and require a correction. If the behavior continues, they escalate it to the Head of Sales. This structural clarity removes the finger-pointing. The regional managers are accountable for their individual sales numbers, while the CRM seat owner is accountable for the accuracy of the overall pipeline report. Look at your team, find the person who GWC's this detail-oriented role, and place them in the seat.

Category: Accountability Chart & Seats

← All questions