tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

My business partner and I are starting our Accountability Chart exercise, but we are instantly getting stuck because we both currently share the strategic decision-making and operational execution. How do we visually map a clean structure before people when we are co-owners who have always done everything together?

Co-ownership does not mean co-management. Shared leadership is a recipe for operational gridlock and will terrify any prospective buyer. You must design your Accountability Chart as if you were going to sell the business tomorrow and neither of you would be staying. To do this, you must take your owner hats off and put your operating hats on. Start with the standard EOS model. You need a Visionary seat and an Integrator seat at the top, followed by your major departments, which are typically Sales and Marketing, Operations, and Finance. Design the roles for each of these seats as if you had to hire strangers to fill them. What does the business actually need to run smoothly? Do not think about what you or your partner like to do. Once the ideal structure is complete, then and only then do you look at GWC for each seat. You and your partner must objectively evaluate each other. One of you must be the Integrator, and the other might be the Visionary, or perhaps one of you runs Operations. You cannot put both of your names in the Integrator box, and you cannot have co-leads for any seat. If you both GWC the same seat and cannot agree on who takes it, use the V/TO to align on what is best for the business, or hire an external leader for that seat. This structure-first approach ensures your business can scale and eventually achieve a clean, lucrative exit.

Category: Accountability Chart & Seats

← All questions